The ITA released its latest team, singles, and doubles rankings today with the Wake Forest men and Florida women remaining in the top spots. In the men’s team rankings Stanford made the biggest jump inside the top 25 with the Cardinal coming up four spots to No. 15 after defeating USC last week. Notre Dame made the biggest overall leap in the top 50 with the Irish rising 11 spots after winning at Florida State.
In the women’s top 25, Mississippi State was the only team to move more than two spots with the Bulldogs falling four spots to No. 20 after losses to Florida and South Carolina. Arizona State, Oklahoma, and Wichita State each rose seven spots last week to No. 29, No. 34, and No. 43 respectively.
These team rankings were comprised of each team’s nine best wins and all losses and it’ll stay at nine up through the selection of the NCAA field. If you want to get an early look at what next week’s rankings look like you can view my real-time rankings which are available to all College Tennis Today subscribers. If you enjoy the content that I put out and you’ve been thinking about subscribing now is the perfect time with the NCAA Tournament coming up next month. You can do a monthly option for $9.99 a month ($.33 a day) and there is no long term commitment. Subscribe for as long or as little as you want.
In the men’s singles rankings Ohio State’s Mikael Torpegaard remains at No. 1 as does Wake Forest’s Christian Seraphim and Skander Mansouri in the men’s doubles rankings. To see the full list of the men’s singles and doubles rankings click here.
In the women’s singles rankings Ohio State’s Francesca Di Lorenzo remains at No. 1 as does North Carolina’s Hayley Carter and Jessie Aney in the women’s doubles rankings. To see the full list of the women’s singles and doubles rankings click here.
MEN’S TOP 50 – 4/11/17 | WOMEN’S TOP 50 | |||||||||
Rank | Pts | School | Prv Rank | Chg | Rank | Pts | School | Prv Rank | Chg | |
1 | 82.03 | Wake Forest University | 1 | 0 | 1 | 84.34 | University of Florida | 1 | 0 | |
2 | 69.01 | Ohio State University | 2 | 0 | 2 | 71.69 | University of Georgia | 2 | 0 | |
3 | 66.71 | University of Virginia | 4 | 1 | 3 | 68.59 | North Carolina | 4 | 1 | |
4 | 65.42 | Baylor University | 3 | -1 | 4 | 65.77 | Ohio State University | 3 | -1 | |
5 | 64.11 | Oklahoma State University | 8 | 3 | 5 | 65.09 | Vanderbilt University | 7 | 2 | |
6 | 61.53 | USC | 5 | -1 | 6 | 61.60 | Georgia Tech | 6 | 0 | |
7 | 57.99 | UCLA | 10 | 3 | 7 | 60.67 | Texas Tech University | 5 | -2 | |
8 | 57.80 | University of Texas | 6 | -2 | 8 | 54.95 | Oklahoma State University | 9 | 1 | |
9 | 56.48 | TCU | 9 | 0 | 9 | 52.31 | University of Michigan | 8 | -1 | |
10 | 53.47 | Texas A&M University | 7 | -3 | 10 | 52.08 | Stanford | 10 | 0 | |
11 | 51.95 | University of Georgia | 13 | 2 | 11 | 46.50 | Auburn University | 12 | 1 | |
12 | 50.28 | California | 12 | 0 | 12 | 45.08 | University of South Carolina | 13 | 1 | |
13 | 48.17 | North Carolina | 11 | -2 | 13 | 45.00 | University of Kentucky | 11 | -2 | |
14 | 43.02 | University of Michigan | 15 | 1 | 14 | 44.01 | Duke University | 15 | 1 | |
15 | 42.28 | Stanford University | 19 | 4 | 15 | 42.81 | Baylor University | 14 | -1 | |
16 | 42.18 | University of Florida | 14 | -2 | 16 | 42.30 | California | 18 | 2 | |
17 | 41.73 | Mississippi State University | 18 | 1 | 17 | 39.94 | Pepperdine | 17 | 0 | |
18 | 40.64 | Georgia Tech | 17 | -1 | 18 | 39.18 | University of Arkansas | 19 | 1 | |
19 | 39.34 | University of Oklahoma | 16 | -3 | 19 | 36.41 | LSU | 21 | 2 | |
20 | 37.27 | Columbia University | 22 | 2 | 20 | 35.22 | Mississippi State University | 16 | -4 | |
21 | 36.44 | Northwestern University | 21 | 0 | 21 | 35.01 | Texas A&M University | 22 | 1 | |
22 | 34.01 | University of South Carolina | 20 | -2 | 22 | 34.78 | UCLA | 20 | -2 | |
23 | 31.81 | University of Oregon | 25 | 2 | 23 | 29.36 | University of Tennessee | 24 | 1 | |
24 | 30.98 | University of Kentucky | 23 | -1 | 24 | 28.22 | University of Texas at Austin | 25 | 1 | |
25 | 30.96 | Cornell University | 24 | -1 | 25 | 26.85 | North Carolina State | 27 | 2 | |
26 | 29.28 | University of South Florida | 26 | 0 | 26 | 25.85 | Wake Forest University | 28 | 2 | |
27 | 27.91 | Tulane University | 28 | 1 | 27 | 25.48 | University of Mississippi | 26 | -1 | |
28 | 26.52 | University of Illinois | 27 | -1 | 28 | 25.36 | University of Notre Dame | 29 | 1 | |
29 | 24.16 | University of Wisconsin | 29 | 0 | 29 | 25.34 | Arizona State University | 36 | 7 | |
30 | 23.62 | University of Central Florida | 31 | 1 | 30 | 25.11 | University of Kansas | 23 | -7 | |
31 | 21.58 | University of Minnesota | 32 | 1 | 31 | 23.42 | TCU | 30 | -1 | |
32 | 21.15 | University of Mississippi | 34 | 2 | 32 | 23.24 | University of Washington | 31 | -1 | |
33 | 20.46 | Florida State University | 30 | -3 | 33 | 21.97 | University of Alabama | 38 | 5 | |
34 | 19.26 | University of Memphis | 33 | -1 | 34 | 20.62 | University of Oklahoma | 41 | 7 | |
35 | 19.22 | Georgia State University | 38 | 3 | 35 | 19.81 | Rice University | 39 | 4 | |
36 | 17.33 | SMU | 36 | 0 | 36 | 19.53 | Northwestern University | 34 | -2 | |
37 | 17.30 | Univ of Washington | 35 | -2 | 37 | 18.04 | Florida International (FIU) | 32 | -5 | |
38 | 17.12 | Rice University | 37 | -1 | 38 | 17.73 | University of Tulsa | 35 | -3 | |
39 | 16.07 | University of Louisville | 40 | 1 | 39 | 17.27 | USC | 40 | 1 | |
40 | 15.39 | Vanderbilt University | 47 | 7 | 40 | 17.17 | University of Virginia | 33 | -7 | |
41 | 15.24 | University of Notre Dame | NR 52 | 11 | 41 | 16.51 | University of Denver | 45 | 4 | |
42 | 15.22 | Utah State University | 39 | -3 | 42 | 15.95 | University of Oregon | 37 | -5 | |
43 | 14.75 | University of Portland | 41 | -2 | 43 | 14.68 | Wichita State University | 50 | 7 | |
44 | 14.22 | Texas Tech University | 42 | -2 | 44 | 14.34 | University of Maryland | 44 | 0 | |
45 | 14.17 | Cal Poly | 46 | 1 | 45 | 14.02 | University of Miami (Florida) | 42 | -3 | |
46 | 13.98 | Duke University | 43 | -3 | 46 | 13.38 | Clemson University | NR 52 | 6 | |
47 | 13.82 | Univ of South Alabama | 44 | -3 | 47 | 12.91 | Florida State University | 47 | 0 | |
48 | 13.67 | UC Santa Barbara | 49 | 1 | 48 | 12.54 | Dartmouth College | 43 | -5 | |
49 | 13.27 | Old Dominion University | NR 51 | 2 | 49 | 11.50 | Harvard University | NR 54 | 5 | |
50 | 13.26 | University of Arkansas | 48 | -2 | 50 | 11.23 | College of William and Mary | 49 | -1 | |
Dropped out: Indiana (45), Auburn (50)
|
Dropped out: Missouri (46), Tulane (48)
|
|||||||||
Down below I have a list the highest ranked conference leaders inside the top 50 along with a list of teams that are in danger of falling below .500. If today’s rankings were used to determine the NCAA field the at-large cutoff would be an unbelievably high number of 47 on both the men’s and women’s sides. Of course all of this will change some over the next three weeks with teams below .500 trying to get to .500 while the mid-major conference leaders ranked in the high 30s and low 40s doing whatever they can to hold on to their spots.
One thing I find interesting is the high number of teams that either have losing records or records on the verge of falling below the .500 mark. As of today there are two men’s teams (Vanderbilt & Texas Tech) that would get left out due to having a losing record while on the women’s side there are a staggering four teams that would miss (Alabama, Virginia, Miami FL, Clemson) with another (USC) that is right at the .500 mark. USC has four matches left and then the conference tournament so they’ll have to win a few or they’ll be out.
I’ve never been a fan of the .500 rule because in my opinion if you have a high enough ranking to make the field you should get in regardless of your record. What I expect will happen in many, if not all, of these instances is the coach will start working his or her contacts to line up State U for a triple or quadruple-header to get their records to where they need to be. I feel for those players at State U because they’ll come in and get whipped multiple times over the course of a day just for the sake of the rule. I can’t blame the coaches for scheduling these matches either because if a bonus and/or job security depends on making the NCAAs then they’d be foolish not doing whatever it takes to get their record above .500. Just as an FYI, the .500 rule is not an ITA rule but rather a NCAA rule.
There’s no place like home.#WelcomeWichita to The American family!
? https://t.co/VGSkcu1EoR pic.twitter.com/OO3islitN9
— The American (@American_Conf) April 7, 2017
Drake and Illinois State added as #SummitMTN Affiliate Members https://t.co/GMv92p2W8i @Drake_MTEN @RedbirdMTEN pic.twitter.com/LUQ9ZTf31y
— The Summit League (@thesummitleague) April 11, 2017
What do you think the chances are that Stanford maintains a top 16 ranking and gets to host this year?
Is Eduardo Nava still on TCU's team? I find it amazing that TCU has managed to still be a top 10 team playing most of the year without Trevor Johnson and Nava. With those two playing, TCU would easily be a top 2 team.
If Stanford wins at both Oregon and Washington this weekend that would all but lock it up. If they lose to Oregon then they'd probably need to beat Cal the following weekend to make up for it.
Nava is still on the team but he's out for the year after tearing his hamstring last year and then having surgery on it before the season. TCU's ability to win the doubles point has been huge this year because that's meant they've only needed to win 3 of the top 4 instead of all 4. Getting Trevor Johnson back in the lineup is big because it gives TCU a decent shot at winning all six courts.
Is it possible that on tje women's side neither Cal, Pepperdine, and Ucla will host regionals. If they travel they will definitely be tough regional outs. Good luck to their hosts.
Same is true on the mens side if Oklahoma does not host, especially if they get Harris back. They are a top ten team when healthy.
UCLA is still a ways back from the No. 16 spot in terms of points so they'll have to win their last three in the regular season plus beat Stanford or Cal in the tournament. I think both Cal and Pepperdine have good shots at hosting. Pepperdine could lock up its spot today if it beats Stanford.
I think the chances of none of them hosting is very slim.